Historical Research for Writers

 

by Sheree Crawford

Researching is, believe it or not, a skill that not everyone has. If you do have it you should definitely put it on your C.V.; good research is often the thing you do not see, but the want of it is blindingly obvious, especially when you write historic fiction, or you’re writing about cultures and people you don’t know anything about.

Research isn’t about consuming every piece of information you can find on your topic; it’s about knowing what is and isn’t important. You can learn this by taking a degree of some sort (History in particular will smack you in the face with research skill requirements before you’ve even finished the first year… whoo-boy that was a learning curve, I can tell you), or you can piggyback my History degree; go on, I don’t mind. I’ll share some of the pearls I’ve discovered while cracking open every proverbial shellfish on that metaphorical beach.

 

Know Your Books

We’re writers, ok, I get it. I Get It. You want to read a super old, musty book and feel the thick, alien paper, and smell the centuries on it…

But these books are WILDLY out-dated. Hugely so, even when they’re less than one hundred years old in some cases. For example, The Problem of the Picts was published in 1955, but today is considered so obsolete as to be of use ONLY to historians and archaeologists, and only then as a contrasting study for those wishing to write about how far we’ve come. The answer? A hell of a lot; in the 67 years since this collection of essays on archaeological practic, Pictish culture, language, architecture, and art was published our conception of the Picts has evolved beyond all recognition.

The lesson here is that old books have their place; they can show you what the author at the time, what society at the time, thought to be the case. If a history text is older than 100 or 150 years old you may start to notice that the style of writing is less rigid, and by the time you’re reading something 200 years old or over referencing of sources becomes a sideline (or nonexistent) activity. A historian would treat these as unreliable materials; contemporary works have value because of their proximity to the time period, modern works are valued because they apply all the available techniques.

Everything else varies.

As an author you don’t need to know all this, per se, but it helps to understand that you should be sticking to more modern texts, or that you can return to the seminal primary sources.

 

Technology is Your Friend

If you have an encyclopedia which covers the relevant time period throw it out the window… haha, no, don’t do that; you’ll kill someone. But seriously, don’t trust encyclopedia; they age poorly. If you want to do surface skim research just use the internet. In fact, for much of the research that authors do online sources are the best sources;

  • They’re up to date
  • They are often written in less flowery, dense language
  • You can do a pinpoint search with ease
  • They’re free

Even if you need or want specialised, academic sources you can often find them through Google Scholar. Remember that book, The Problem of the Picts? When writing an essay discussing our development since it’s publication I made more use of an article by Steven Driscoll found on Google Scholar than I did of many books from the University library. The internet may be full of misinformation, but if you look in the right places you can find exactly what you need quickly and easily. Consider;

  • Google Scholar
  • Foundation/trust pages for specific historic places or events (e.g. the Highland Clearances webpage, or the website for Stirling Castle)
  • Wikipedia (to an extent, but be sure to fact check)
  • Pinpoint searches, e.g. “when was X invented” or “what did Y do with Z”

 

Note-Keeping Tips

When researching you should keep notes as you go; make sure you keep a note of which book the information came from and which page you found it on (this will be a God-send if you have to double check the information). When keeping notes most people make the mistake of writing down every single fact that they come across. This is time consuming and unhelpful.

When taking notes you need to keep two things in mind: your question/topic, and what kind of information will be relevant to it.

You should think about;

  • What events are key to your story
  • How important wider context is (i.e. will what’s happening in France during the period affect your characters as much as what’s happening in Germany?)
  • Whether or not you need a chronology and what events should be present on it (for example, if you’re writing a story about Jewish people escaping/hiding in Nazi Germany the dates/chronology will be more important than if you’re writing about someone who happens to live through the highland clearances but is not affected).
  • Details of material culture, e.g. clothing, architecture, pottery. These will likely be more important to the authenticity of your story than things like medieval warfare tactics or the foreign policy of the country your characters live in.

Keep your notes concise and in bullet points for quick reference; you could consider colour coding, too, for ease.

 

Alternative Sources

There are some things that academic texts cannot give you a feel for, or which will be better illustrated by alternative sources. Speech patterns, for example, or architecture can be better grasped out with the local university or college library. You can consider the following options to supplement your more academic resources;

  • Movies or TV Series in the same time period or place
  • Books dealing with similar themes, countries, or based in the same time period
  • Visiting places you mention first hand
  • Talking to experts in the field; many academics will be happy to answer questions if you approach them politely and with the understanding that they are busy people.

 

How Much is Too Much?

This is a hard question to answer as researching for a novel is wildly different from researching for an essay; you will pass on much less to the reader when writing a novel than when writing an essay.

What they have in common, however, is that it’s important for you to know and be familiar with the largest part of the issue. In both case you would need to know about WWII, for example, the start and end dates for all major parties involved, the key battles, the key figures, and the kinds of equipment available to people then. Unlike when writing an academic essay, however, writers producing a novel might need to know how the rationing system worked on a day to day basis, what foods were most commonly found and which were very rare, what the average worker earned, and the common fashions of the day.

As a basic benchmark, however, you consider perhaps reading a basic, high-school level educational text, a novel written in the same period, and perhaps watch any available documentaries which cover the period in question. After this point you can rely on on the spot research for minor details. If research is getting in the way of actually writing then you should definitely call a halt and move on; you can always go back to fill in gaps in your knowledge later.

Historical research is not only a good tool for writers, but is a skill that can carried across to other jobs; it requires the ability to prioritise information, recognise reliable sources, and deploy facts in effective ways. This is a skill well worth developing.

 

 

 

Guest post contributed by Sheree Crawford. Sheree is a UK based content writer and ghostwriter and often writes about the art of writing.

Advertisements

27 thoughts on “Historical Research for Writers”

  1. From the perspective of somebody who studied archaeology at bachelor’s and master’s level, there is nothing that grates on me more than lazy research. Those of us who know the period willl pick up on minor details that others without the background won’t notice. The little things are forgiveable; the big things are not.

    Like

  2. Thank you for this post. It is very helpful. I write historical novels (among othe genres) and I like to keep the clothing, housing, way of life relevent to that time period for the area I’m writing about. This is the first I have heard of Google Scholar. I will certainly give it a try.

    Like

  3. Very timely for me – just about to get back to the historical novel I started more than a year ago. I’ve always found the research can be voluminous but boils down to a lot less in the writing. Even so, it gives the researcher a sense of security to have so much material to back up what they’re writing.

    Like

  4. History, like any field of endeavour, goes through its styles and intellectual phases – hence the way older stuff gets discredited or dated. It’s more than just ‘the facts’, it’s about how we understand, frame and receive them, and history is one of the few fields I’m aware of where this is consciously considered. (Philosophy is another – and one of my post-grad lecturers in history, Peter Munz, was witness to the infamous Oxford ‘poker’ debate between his two teachers, Karl Popper and Ludwig Wittgenstein, which Wittgenstein entered armed with a fire-poker… all over how to think about thinking…)

    For me – as with you – the essence of having a technical background in history is that it teaches a critical faculty, which I find has all sorts of uses when writing. The skill certainly transfers to the research needed for historical fiction writing which, as you say, is of itself very different from what is required to produce a scholarly essay.

    Like

  5. Thanks Ryan for sharing. Good article Sheree. Your tips on note-taking and putting order into one’s research is a valuable piece of information. I have many sub-folders and that way I can see at a glance whether a particular set of notes are just for my background knowledge or essence of selected parts woven into my story.
    I am writing my mother’s story – history through her eyes at the age she was for the various events or situation. It focuses on her emerging independence and determination to become a pioneer in the male-dominated field of accounting in the 1940s, leading to being an inspiration as a mother and career woman from the 1960s onwards complete with ‘family friendly’ contracts. As a result of my research and presenting, on request, a chronological chart of information, my mother Patricia Evans has just been accepted into the National Pioneer Women’s Hall of Fame in Alice Springs Australia. Now to continue writing and weaving her story.
    Reblogged https://suzannenewnham.wordpress.com/2017/07/30/historical-research-for-writers/

    Like

  6. Thank you for your articles! I read them almost everyday and find them so helpful! I try my best to apply everything to my stories and you’ve helped me tremendously!

    Thank you!

    Like

  7. I think research is like all background, it informs your work even when it is never mentioned. As for on-line resources, I love them. You should check a couple of sources ( sometimes ‘source’ just copy and pass it on) but they are usually great source of quick info! Great post.

    Like

  8. One thing I’ve found to be useful is the “old timers”. If your story takes place in say the last 100 years or so, they are a repository of information you can’t beat. They can tell you the things that aren’t written down, like incidents that happened, or who used to live where, and such.

    Examples I’ve discovered, I’ve a story that takes places in the little town of Las Sauces Colorado. Once upon a time, it was the going concern, now it’s just a cluster of houses and farms by the Rio Grande. The old timers told me stories I never heard of elsewhere, about heartaches, triumphs, Gun fights, and even a ghost story or two that happened long ago.

    In some cases, they were eye witnesses, in others, they served to relay information from their “Old Timers”.

    While I might not ever use that information, it’s stories that at the very least that needs to be preserved.

    Like

  9. Good piece! Just a few more thoughts–from a librarian. Online is great, but know what you are looking at. Is the web site credible? Everything found via Google Scholar isn’t legit (nearly all is). Wikipedia can offer a good starting point for familiarity with the language but then move to a reputable database–JSTOR or the many EBSCO HOST databases, many of which are available via your public library card online. Then there are librarians. The cliche is we are the original search engine, but it is true. But we specialize. Don’t just ask the children’s librarian or an engineering librarian to help you research a certain battle of the Civil War for example. Call the location–is there a historical society, national park, home on the historic register, etc? Call them! Primary sources are tremendously helpful. Secondary sources have filtered information. Anything beyond that is subject to the whim of revisionism driven by changes in political climate, social norms, etc.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s