Researching is, believe it or not, a skill that not everyone has. If you do have it you should definitely put it on your C.V.; good research is often the thing you do not see, but the want of it is blindingly obvious, especially when you write historic fiction, or you’re writing about cultures and people you don’t know anything about.
Research isn’t about consuming every piece of information you can find on your topic; it’s about knowing what is and isn’t important. You can learn this by taking a degree of some sort (History in particular will smack you in the face with research skill requirements before you’ve even finished the first year… whoo-boy that was a learning curve, I can tell you), or you can piggyback my History degree; go on, I don’t mind. I’ll share some of the pearls I’ve discovered while cracking open every proverbial shellfish on that metaphorical beach.
Know Your Books
We’re writers, ok, I get it. I Get It. You want to read a super old, musty book and feel the thick, alien paper, and smell the centuries on it…
But these books are WILDLY out-dated. Hugely so, even when they’re less than one hundred years old in some cases. For example, The Problem of the Picts was published in 1955, but today is considered so obsolete as to be of use ONLY to historians and archaeologists, and only then as a contrasting study for those wishing to write about how far we’ve come. The answer? A hell of a lot; in the 67 years since this collection of essays on archaeological practic, Pictish culture, language, architecture, and art was published our conception of the Picts has evolved beyond all recognition.
The lesson here is that old books have their place; they can show you what the author at the time, what society at the time, thought to be the case. If a history text is older than 100 or 150 years old you may start to notice that the style of writing is less rigid, and by the time you’re reading something 200 years old or over referencing of sources becomes a sideline (or nonexistent) activity. A historian would treat these as unreliable materials; contemporary works have value because of their proximity to the time period, modern works are valued because they apply all the available techniques.
Everything else varies.
As an author you don’t need to know all this, per se, but it helps to understand that you should be sticking to more modern texts, or that you can return to the seminal primary sources.
Technology is Your Friend
If you have an encyclopedia which covers the relevant time period throw it out the window… haha, no, don’t do that; you’ll kill someone. But seriously, don’t trust encyclopedia; they age poorly. If you want to do surface skim research just use the internet. In fact, for much of the research that authors do online sources are the best sources;
- They’re up to date
- They are often written in less flowery, dense language
- You can do a pinpoint search with ease
- They’re free
Even if you need or want specialised, academic sources you can often find them through Google Scholar. Remember that book, The Problem of the Picts? When writing an essay discussing our development since it’s publication I made more use of an article by Steven Driscoll found on Google Scholar than I did of many books from the University library. The internet may be full of misinformation, but if you look in the right places you can find exactly what you need quickly and easily. Consider;
- Google Scholar
- Foundation/trust pages for specific historic places or events (e.g. the Highland Clearances webpage, or the website for Stirling Castle)
- Wikipedia (to an extent, but be sure to fact check)
- Pinpoint searches, e.g. “when was X invented” or “what did Y do with Z”
[Related: Want a second pair of eyes? Check out our proofreading service.]
When researching you should keep notes as you go; make sure you keep a note of which book the information came from and which page you found it on (this will be a God-send if you have to double check the information). When keeping notes most people make the mistake of writing down every single fact that they come across. This is time consuming and unhelpful.
When taking notes you need to keep two things in mind: your question/topic, and what kind of information will be relevant to it.
You should think about;
- What events are key to your story
- How important wider context is (i.e. will what’s happening in France during the period affect your characters as much as what’s happening in Germany?)
- Whether or not you need a chronology and what events should be present on it (for example, if you’re writing a story about Jewish people escaping/hiding in Nazi Germany the dates/chronology will be more important than if you’re writing about someone who happens to live through the highland clearances but is not affected).
- Details of material culture, e.g. clothing, architecture, pottery. These will likely be more important to the authenticity of your story than things like medieval warfare tactics or the foreign policy of the country your characters live in.
Keep your notes concise and in bullet points for quick reference; you could consider colour coding, too, for ease.
There are some things that academic texts cannot give you a feel for, or which will be better illustrated by alternative sources. Speech patterns, for example, or architecture can be better grasped out with the local university or college library. You can consider the following options to supplement your more academic resources;
- Movies or TV Series in the same time period or place
- Books dealing with similar themes, countries, or based in the same time period
- Visiting places you mention first hand
- Talking to experts in the field; many academics will be happy to answer questions if you approach them politely and with the understanding that they are busy people.
How Much is Too Much?
This is a hard question to answer as researching for a novel is wildly different from researching for an essay; you will pass on much less to the reader when writing a novel than when writing an essay.
What they have in common, however, is that it’s important for you to know and be familiar with the largest part of the issue. In both case you would need to know about WWII, for example, the start and end dates for all major parties involved, the key battles, the key figures, and the kinds of equipment available to people then. Unlike when writing an academic essay, however, writers producing a novel might need to know how the rationing system worked on a day to day basis, what foods were most commonly found and which were very rare, what the average worker earned, and the common fashions of the day.
As a basic benchmark, however, you consider perhaps reading a basic, high-school level educational text, a novel written in the same period, and perhaps watch any available documentaries which cover the period in question. After this point you can rely on on the spot research for minor details. If research is getting in the way of actually writing then you should definitely call a halt and move on; you can always go back to fill in gaps in your knowledge later.
Historical research is not only a good tool for writers, but is a skill that can carried across to other jobs; it requires the ability to prioritise information, recognise reliable sources, and deploy facts in effective ways. This is a skill well worth developing.
This guest post was contributed by Sheree Crawford. Sheree is a UK based content writer and ghostwriter and often writes about the art of writing.
While I write sci-fi, set anywhere between six months and one hundred years from now, I still had to research the histories of the locations of my stories (Portland, Knoxville, central Texas, etc.).
Further, when I wrote the centerpiece battle of “Goddess Crusade,” as it was based upon the Battle of Pharsalus, 48 BC, I had to know that military action backward and forward and in 3D; probably three weeks of research and note-taking.
While not disagreeing, I would add a note of warning to Crawford’s recommendation of modern, electronic sources. The closer you get to our time, the more political bias – a polite way of saying “woke garbage” – you will find. Personally, I assume any wikipedia article about any event after the 16th Century is compromised.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Sherree, you made a lot of good points in this article.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Kim's Musings.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I spend most of my time doing historical research and find a lot of modern sources are flawed with modern opinions. I would be embarrassed to use Wiki as a source. Unfortunately people no longer have the stamina to read old books and want their information quickly. But research is a process and it takes time. For one short blog post I spend a minimum of 3 weeks in research alone and on a longer one it can be months. I want my readers to have the information they need on the topic and it is my duty to be a diligent researcher.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Reblogged this on Claire Plaisted – Multi-Genre Author and commented:
A wonderful informative post on research. I love history and have over 20 years of family history research to work with. I can find most things I look for, though this information is great reminder on what is out there. Enjoy the read.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting post, with all research, checking several sources is key. Both in book for and digital. I like research that also connects you to people, like speaking to museum curators and those in the industries you wish to write in or who study them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on The Reluctant Poet.
LikeLiked by 1 person