Writing Tools: High-Tech, Low-Tech, and the Unnecessary

Computer

 

by  Christina Dalcher

Stephen King talks about a sort of writer’s toolbox in his book On Writing. I’ll be discussing a different set of tools on Le Blog today.

Ready?

Let’s go.

 

The high-tech

A voice recorder
You know that iThing you carry around with you all the time? I have one, but it’s the kind that doesn’t have a phone in it. (Yes, really. There exists a Jack Reacher in a skirt and her name rhymes with mine.) Whether it’s an iThing, an iPhone, an iPod/Pad/Raq, it’s got one of those little voice memo apps on it somewhere. Sometimes I like to talk into it while I’m walking the streets of The American South and pretend I’m Woody Allen. Point? Take it along with you and use it when you get an idea.

 

Querytracker
Useful if you’ve finished your novel (AND threw it out to some beta readers, listened to your crit partners, and revised the bugger, which of course you did, right?), but also useful to get an idea of how the querying gig works, start collecting a list of literary agents, and learn a bit about the fine art of the query letter. Basic membership is free and allows you to track queries and responses for one project at a time. Premium membership ($25 annually) adds in a few goodies like statistics and response timelines, both of which come in handy if you want to waste time interpreting the data while you’re waiting for the rejections to roll in. Naturally, I have a premium membership.

 

Scribophile
An absolute necessity if you need your work critiqued. If you don’t need your work critiqued, you’re an idiot and you should stop reading right here because a writing career isn’t for you. Scribophile has some fantastic folks on it (along with a few weirdos who enjoy lecturing), and it’s a nice way to find some writing partners whose names don’t rhyme with Mom. I like the professionalism of my Scribo pals, my Flash group, and the fact that I don’t really know any of them so if they tell me I suck, I don’t take it too hard. Basic membership is free; premium membership (which I highly recommend) costs you sixty-five smackeroos per dozen lunar cycles. That’s $65 a year.

 

Scrivener
Imagine having your entire writing desk–notes, research, media, synopses, outlines, character sketches, setting descriptions, front matter, index cards–all in ONE document on your computer. Not one folder, one document. This is an incredible piece of software with built-in goodies that you can set up in Word, but you probably never will because Word can be a pain in the ass. Yes, there’s a learning curve. There’s also a tutorial to help you climb that curve. (Think you’re too good for tutorials? Trust me. You need this one.) I drafted my first novel without Scrivener and honestly don’t know how I did it. $45 for the software package buys you your very own virtual writing studio. Buy a premium membership on Scribophile or win NaNoWriMo and you get a discount.

 

Submittable
I know very few literary agents who use this Internet-based submissions manager–they still seem to prefer cluttered inboxes–but if you write shorts or flash and you fancy getting any of your work published, you’ll need a free subscription. I’d say about 90% of the fiction markets I sub to only accept electronic submissions via Submittable. Just follow the link on their subs page and fill out the little form. While your waiting for the inevitable rejections to flood in (you will be rejected, by the way), you can track those subs or bask in your past glory.

 

Publishers Marketplace
This one’s really for the industry pros, but I’m including it for those writers who:

A. Want to see what’s being sold a year or two before it hits the shelves
B. Need to scope out a literary agent’s prior deals
C. Enjoy stalking editors and publishers who are about to reject your novel
D. All of the above

All that lovely information comes at a price: $25 per month or $275 per year (note the lack of a discount). Depending on your financial circs, you’ll find this cheap or expensive, and aside from interest value, I’d be hard-pressed to tell you why you need a PM membership at all. My suggestion? Buy a one-month membership when you get an offer of representation and check out the agent’s past deals. If there aren’t any, ask yourself if you really want to accept that offer.

[Note: Agent member pages are always free to view on PM. The time to read these is before you query.]

 

The (Submissions) Grinder
AKA “The Grinder”

If you write short-form, you need this. Why? Because if you’re anything like that rabid pack of flash fiction fiends I’ve been getting to know over the past few months, you crank out few stories a week. Sometimes one a day. And because you don’t need (in most cases) to find yourself an agent who will send your lovely writing around town, you’ll be submitting it yourself. Here’s how crazy it can get:

Let’s say you write ten stories in July. By August 1st, they’re revised and polished and ready to go out on submission. So you have a stack of ten. Which you are going to submit to a dozen, maybe more, lit mags, some of which don’t operate via Submittable, some of which do. Most of them accept simultaneous subs; a few of them accept multiple pieces in a single submission. And ALL of them want to be notified immediately if you get accepted somewhere else before they get around to rejecting you.

So you need to keep track. Sure, you can make yourself an Excel spreadsheet, but why bother? The Grinder handles all those pesky little subs for free, tracking the date you subbed, the date the nice editor people acknowledged receipt, and the date they sent you that form rejection that tasted like “Not for me, thanks, — Joe.”

Plus, you can see where you are in the response timeline, search for appropriate markets for your work (you weren’t really going to send that horror piece to a romance mag, were you?), save contest deadlines, track your income (we flash freaks get paid by the word or not at all), and what-not. And you can feel like a piece of literary crap when you see your writing pals’ names in the acceptances feed. It’s nice. And did I mention it’s free?

 

Duotrope
It does the same thing the Grinder does, only it costs $5 a month or $50 a year. Go on, sign up. You know you want to. And you can write it off on your taxes for the first few years before the IRS calls that thing you do for forty hours a week a hobby.

 

The low-tech
Okay, maybe not THAT low-tech…

A notebook
I have a nice little orange one. I write ideas in it when I wake up at zero dark-thirty in the mornings.

 

Several pads of ruled paper
You need these to scribble stuff on. I need them to draw diagrams of crystal radio sets.

 

A whiteboard
Especially useful if you’re plotting a monster of a novel or anything involving time-travel. You can also write your shopping list on it. Or the number of the nearest take-away Chinese place.

 

A library card
Because you are reading stuff when you’re not writing, aren’t you?

 

The unnecessary

Twitter
Time-sucker.

Facebook
Time-sucker.

Instagram
Time-sucker.

Pinterest
What is this, anyway? Oh, that’s right–it’s a time-sucker.

Notice a common thread here? Look, I have a Twitter account. I have a Facebook author page (with TWELVE followers!). I spend precious little time on either of them because every minute I hang about Twitting is a minute I’m not writing. Use them, by all means (and if you ever figure out how Pinterest can help you, do let me know), but use ’em judiciously. Because I’d love to know where to read your latest work, but I really don’t care what you ate for lunch.

I mean that in a nice way.

 

 

Guest post contributed by Christina Dalcher. Christina has a Ph.D. from Georgetown University in Phonology and Phonetics. Check out more of her articles on her blog.

Advertisements

23 thoughts on “Writing Tools: High-Tech, Low-Tech, and the Unnecessary”

  1. Interesting how so many writers looking into or doing self-publishing is saying how ineffective Twitter and Facebook are in their marketing efforts. On the other hand, I hear the non-self-publishing, non-writers, i.e., regular folks, say they think Facebook would be a good tool because of so many connections you can make. So depressing . . .

    Like

  2. Thanks for posting this list. I want to take my writing more seriously, and I didn’t know about many of these high tech tools. I’ve been happy with my library card and notebook and blog. Scribophile looks pretty cool. Also, I’m really tempted to pin this onto my time-sucking pinterest board. Lol.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Twitter has its benefits, but the secret is to use it judiciously. The reason I created an account just over a year ago was so I could pitch my novel in various Twitter parties. Agents scope these out and if they like a particular pitch, they request pages. Neat way to skip ahead in the querying queue. I also like it because it helps me keep tabs on friends’ publications. The trick, I think, is to do a bit of twittering and then close down that browser and return to the blank page!

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Time suckers. Yup. Except an interesting this has been happening with Twitter lately. I discover the power of hashtags. Seems when I write a post and use #mondayblogs or #amwriting and get an influx of page views. Interesting…. As for Pinterest, my teen knows how to loop these social media sites together to leverage her writing views. She’s on wattpad (I know, I know, another time sucker..but hear me out now) and tied her art images of her story characters to Instagram. Ban! 24,000 reads on her story and counting.
    All of this is to say, 1) writing comes first, second and last and 2) there is a way to use social media wisely and judiciously and any other “ly” word that fits. You just got to make sure it doesn’t suck your time.

    Like

  4. This is a great list, and very comprehensive. I’ll have to try Scribophile and QueryTracker. For people who can’t spring for the $45 to buy Scrivener, yWriter is also a free alternative. Not as colorful or drag/drop, but still very good for organizing by scenes.

    Like

  5. Reblogged this on quirkywritingcorner and commented:
    I was on Twitter and enjoyed a lot of the posts; however, I did find it a huge waste of time. I received email notifications and was up to 5000 before I shut it down. I sold not one single book during the few months I was with them. Facebook and my blog are enough.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s